🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to restrict social networking access for those under 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Lawmakers, campaigners, and parents are watching intently to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

European Momentum

Across Europe, a rising chorus of states are moving toward comparable measures.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM stating that smartphones and platforms are "robbing our children's childhood". Legislation could be formalized soon.
• The Norwegian government is planning to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to protect children from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to verify the user details of social media account holders. The media minister have suggested that an Australia-style ban could be "an measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has called on parliament to pass a law lifting the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has recommended a related action, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has urged parents to restrict their children from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has approved a symbolic resolution demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 without parental consent is given. While it highlights of the "habit-forming" quality of these apps, the step does not establish binding law.

"A strong age limit is a solid foundation," said one European lawmaker supporting the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Eye

For the United Kingdom, the administration has kept open a future ban, stating that "no option is being dismissed" but insisting any decision must be "grounded in robust data".

Previously, support gathered behind a legislative effort to introduce restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately weakened. Instead, the government pledged to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have raised warnings. A prominent charity set up by the relatives of a young person who took her own life after being exposed to dangerous platform posts suggests that a simple age ban could fail to protect children and could result in a "dangerous transition" of harm when users turn 16.

"This ban is a response to the inability of the tech sector to design tools that are secure and fit for minors," said a leading peer.

The US: A Fragmented Landscape

Stateside, legislation is largely happening at the state level due to country-wide inaction.

• Utah demands adult approval for under-18s to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has signed a bill barring children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a rule restricting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with extra time requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted measures demanding adult authorization for under-16s to set up social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from various politicians to follow the Australian lead, a federal ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Views

Beyond Europe and the US, further countries are also exploring options.

• The Malaysian government intends to prohibit social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for one major platform to 16.

But, world agencies strike a more cautious stance. The UN children's agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "could have unintended consequences". The organization highlights that social networks can be a "vital connection" for isolated young people and that government action should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to invest in user protection.

While this international debate evolves, the actions of the Australian government and others demonstrate that states globally are less and less prepared to stand by for tech companies to make changes on their own.